Verk

Team Performance

Member productivity, workload distribution, insights

Team Performance Analytics

Monitor team productivity, workload balance, and collaboration patterns to build a more effective and sustainable team.

Overview

Team performance analytics provide insights into:

  • Individual and collective productivity
  • Workload distribution across team members
  • Collaboration patterns and communication
  • Team capacity and utilization
  • Performance trends over time

Use these metrics to support team members, identify training needs, and optimize team composition.

Prerequisites

Required role:

  • Members: See their own metrics
  • Admins: View team-wide analytics
  • Organization Owners: Full access across all teams

Plan availability:

  • Free: Basic team metrics (5 members max)
  • Pro: Advanced analytics (unlimited members)
  • Enterprise: Full suite with custom metrics

Accessing Team Analytics

View team performance data:

  1. Navigate to AnalyticsTeam
  2. Select time period (week, month, quarter, year)
  3. Choose view:
  • Overview (high-level summary)
  • Individual Performance
  • Workload Distribution
  • Collaboration Metrics
  • Comparative Analysis
  1. Apply filters:
  • Specific team members
  • Projects
  • Task types
  • Date ranges

Create saved views for common analyses like "Weekly Team Review" or "Monthly Performance Check."

Key Team Metrics

Team Productivity

Overall output and efficiency metrics:

Tasks Completed per Week: Track total team output over time.

Example Team (5 members):
Week 1: 42 tasks
Week 2: 38 tasks
Week 3: 45 tasks
Week 4: 40 tasks
Average: 41 tasks/week

Team Velocity: Combined velocity showing team capacity.

Completion Rate: Percentage of tasks finished on time across the team.

Team Efficiency Score: Composite metric combining:

  • Completion rate (40%)
  • Average cycle time (30%)
  • Estimation accuracy (20%)
  • Collaboration quality (10%)

Score ranges:

  • 85-100: Excellent
  • 70-84: Good
  • 50-69: Needs improvement
  • Below 50: Requires attention

Individual Performance

Personal productivity metrics for each team member:

Available for each person:

  • Tasks completed (this period)
  • Average completion time
  • Completion rate
  • Overdue task count
  • Estimation accuracy
  • Collaboration score (based on comments, reviews)
  • Response time to mentions/assignments

Comparison to team:

  • Personal velocity vs. team average
  • Relative completion time
  • Task distribution (what percentage of team's work)

Individual metrics should support growth, not create competition. Focus on trends and improvement, not rankings.

Workload Distribution

How work is balanced across the team:

Task Distribution:

Member A: 24 tasks (29%)
Member B: 18 tasks (22%)
Member C: 16 tasks (19%)
Member D: 15 tasks (18%)
Member E: 10 tasks (12%)
Total: 83 tasks

Healthy distribution:

  • Each member has 15-25% of total tasks
  • Variation within 10% of average
  • No single member overwhelmed (>30%)
  • No member underutilized (below 10%)

Warning signs:

  • One person handling >40% of tasks
  • Large gaps between highest and lowest
  • Consistent pattern of imbalance over multiple weeks

Workload Heatmap: Visual representation showing:

  • Who is overloaded (red)
  • Who has capacity (green)
  • Balanced workload (yellow)

Collaboration Metrics

How effectively the team works together:

Team Communication:

  • Comments per task
  • Response time to questions
  • Mention usage and responsiveness
  • Review feedback quality

Knowledge Sharing:

  • Documentation contributions
  • Help provided to teammates
  • Cross-project collaboration
  • Skill transfer activities

Handoff Efficiency: How smoothly work moves between team members:

  • Average handoff time
  • Number of handoffs per task
  • Rework after handoff (quality indicator)

Workload Balancing

Identifying Imbalance

Detect workload issues early:

Automatic alerts when:

  • Member has >30% more tasks than average
  • Member has less than 50% of average tasks
  • Same person consistently overloaded (3+ weeks)
  • Task assignments don't match availability

Manual checks:

  1. View Workload Distribution chart weekly
  2. Compare assigned vs. completed tasks per person
  3. Check overdue task concentration
  4. Review task complexity distribution (not all tasks are equal)

Rebalancing Strategies

Short-term fixes:

  1. Reassign upcoming tasks from overloaded members
  2. Defer low-priority work for overwhelmed members
  3. Pair underutilized members with complex tasks for learning
  4. Temporarily increase capacity (if possible)

Long-term solutions:

  1. Review task assignment process
  2. Cross-train team members for better flexibility
  3. Adjust team composition or size
  4. Implement capacity planning
  5. Use AI agents to automate repetitive tasks

Capacity Planning

Plan work based on actual capacity:

Calculate individual capacity:

Available hours per week: 40
Meetings/admin: -10 hours
Focus time: 30 hours
Estimated task hours: 25-28 hours (buffer for unknowns)

Team capacity calculation:

5 team members × 25 hours = 125 productive hours/week
Average task duration: 5 hours
Expected tasks per week: 25 tasks (with buffer)

Adjust for:

  • Vacations and time off
  • Holidays
  • Training and development time
  • On-call rotations
  • Support duties

Performance Tracking

Individual Development

Track growth and improvement:

Skill Development:

  • Task types handled over time
  • Complexity of work increasing
  • Estimation accuracy improving
  • Completion time decreasing

Growth Indicators:

  • Taking on new task types
  • Mentoring others
  • Improving collaboration scores
  • Reducing rework and errors

Support Opportunities:

  • Identify struggling team members early
  • Provide targeted training
  • Adjust task complexity to skill level
  • Offer mentorship or pairing

Team Evolution

Monitor team improvement over time:

Trend Analysis: Compare current period to previous:

  • Is team velocity increasing?
  • Are completion rates improving?
  • Is cycle time decreasing?
  • Are estimates more accurate?

Milestone Tracking: Set and monitor team goals:

  • Increase velocity by 10% this quarter
  • Improve on-time completion to 85%
  • Reduce average cycle time to 3 days
  • Achieve 90% estimation accuracy

Retrospective Support: Use analytics in team retrospectives:

  • What improved this sprint?
  • Where did we struggle?
  • What patterns do the metrics reveal?
  • What should we try differently?

Advanced Analytics

Productivity Patterns

Identify when your team works best:

Time-based Analysis:

  • Best days: Which day of week has highest completion rates?
  • Peak hours: When are most tasks completed?
  • Slump periods: When does productivity dip?

Use insights to:

  • Schedule important work during peak times
  • Avoid meetings during high-productivity hours
  • Plan sprint work around productivity patterns
  • Account for known slump periods

Skill Matrix

Visualize team capabilities:

Create a skill matrix:

Skill   | Member A | Member B | Member C | Member D | Member E
--------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
Frontend Dev | Expert | Advanced | Basic | Basic | None
Backend Dev | Advanced | Expert | Advanced | Basic | Basic
Design  | Basic | None  | Advanced | Expert | Basic
Testing  | Advanced | Basic | Expert | Advanced | Advanced
DevOps  | Basic | Advanced | Basic | Basic | Expert

Skill levels:

  • Expert: Can mentor others
  • Advanced: Independent work
  • Basic: Can contribute with guidance
  • None: Needs training

Use for:

  • Task assignment optimization
  • Identifying training needs
  • Succession planning
  • Hiring decisions

Comparative Analysis

Compare team performance across different dimensions:

Project Comparison: How does the team perform on different projects?

  • Project A: 85% completion rate
  • Project B: 92% completion rate
  • Project C: 78% completion rate

Analysis: Project C may need clearer requirements or better planning.

Sprint Comparison: Track performance across sprints:

  • Sprint velocity trends
  • Completion rate changes
  • Quality metrics evolution
  • Team satisfaction scores

Team Comparison (for organizations with multiple teams):

  • Benchmark against other teams
  • Share best practices from high performers
  • Identify common challenges
  • Learn from diverse approaches

Team Analytics Use Cases

Use Case 1: Sprint Retrospective

Prepare for retrospective:

  1. Pull last sprint metrics:
  • Velocity actual vs. planned
  • Completion rate
  • Average cycle time
  • Workload distribution
  1. Identify discussion topics:
  • Why did velocity drop 20%?
  • Why did Member B have 40% of tasks?
  • Why did cycle time increase?
  1. Lead data-driven conversation
  2. Set improvement goals for next sprint

Outcome: Fact-based retrospectives with clear action items

Use Case 2: Performance Reviews

Support 1-on-1 conversations:

  1. Review individual metrics (6-month view):
  • Task completion trends
  • Skill development (task types handled)
  • Collaboration contributions
  • Improvement areas
  1. Celebrate growth:
  • "Your cycle time decreased by 30%"
  • "You're now handling advanced tasks independently"
  • "Your collaboration score increased significantly"
  1. Set personal goals:
  • "Let's improve estimation accuracy"
  • "Try mentoring junior team members"
  • "Take on more complex projects"

Outcome: Objective performance discussions with clear evidence

Use Case 3: Capacity Planning

Plan next quarter:

  1. Review last quarter team capacity
  2. Account for upcoming absences (vacations, holidays)
  3. Calculate available capacity
  4. Plan projects based on realistic capacity
  5. Build in 20% buffer for unknowns

Example:

Last quarter velocity: 160 tasks
Upcoming time off: -15 days (3 team members)
Reduced capacity: -24 tasks
Expected velocity: 136 tasks
Add 20% buffer: Plan for 108-120 tasks

Outcome: Realistic commitments and predictable delivery

Use Case 4: Team Rebalancing

Address workload imbalance:

  1. Identify overloaded member (Sarah: 35 tasks, team avg: 22)
  2. Review task complexity (not just count)
  3. Reassign appropriate tasks to team members with capacity
  4. Provide Sarah with high-priority work only
  5. Monitor for improvement over 2 weeks

Outcome: Healthier workload distribution, reduced burnout risk

Troubleshooting

Metrics Show Low Productivity But Team Is Busy

Possible causes:

  • Tasks not being marked complete
  • Working on tasks not in Verk
  • Meetings and interruptions not tracked
  • Task complexity higher than usual
  • Scope creep extending task duration

Investigation:

  1. Survey team about where time is spent
  2. Check for untracked work
  3. Review meeting schedules
  4. Analyze task complexity trends

Individual Metrics Seem Unfair

Common concerns:

  • "Senior members get easier tasks"
  • "I work on complex projects that take longer"
  • "My tasks require more research/coordination"

Solutions:

  1. Add task complexity weighting (story points)
  2. Track different task types separately
  3. Focus on improvement trends, not absolute numbers
  4. Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative assessment
  5. Consider context in all evaluations

Team Metrics Declining

Diagnostic steps:

  1. Review workload changes (increased complexity?)
  2. Check for team changes (new members ramping up?)
  3. Identify external factors (shifting priorities, increased meetings)
  4. Survey team about obstacles
  5. Review process changes recently implemented

Recovery plan:

  1. Address identified root causes
  2. Remove unnecessary obstacles
  3. Provide additional support where needed
  4. Adjust expectations if complexity increased
  5. Celebrate small improvements

Analytics Creating Team Tension

Warning signs:

  • Team members gaming metrics
  • Unhealthy competition
  • Resistance to tracking
  • Focus on quantity over quality

Corrective actions:

  1. Emphasize metrics are for team improvement, not individual judgment
  2. Focus on team goals, not individual rankings
  3. Combine metrics with qualitative feedback
  4. Use metrics to identify support needs, not punishment
  5. Make metrics transparent and collaborative

Best Practices

Focus on Team Success Celebrate team achievements, not individual competition. Use metrics to lift everyone up.

Combine with Conversations Metrics reveal what is happening, conversations reveal why. Always pair data with discussion.

Look for Patterns Single-week anomalies don't matter. Focus on trends over 4+ weeks for meaningful insights.

Account for Context Not all tasks are equal. Consider complexity, uncertainty, and dependencies when interpreting metrics.

Use for Support, Not Surveillance Identify where team members need help, training, or resources. Don't use metrics to micromanage.

Make Metrics Transparent Team members should have access to their own metrics and understand how they're calculated.

Set Team Goals Together Collaborative goal-setting creates ownership. Let the team set their own improvement targets.

Celebrate Improvements Recognize when metrics improve. This reinforces positive changes and motivates continued growth.

Review Regularly Weekly quick checks and monthly deep dives keep metrics useful and current.

Act on Insights Metrics without action are wasted. Every insight should lead to a decision or experiment.


Questions about team analytics? Our support team can help you interpret metrics and build effective teams.