Team Performance
Member productivity, workload distribution, insights
Team Performance Analytics
Monitor team productivity, workload balance, and collaboration patterns to build a more effective and sustainable team.
Overview
Team performance analytics provide insights into:
- Individual and collective productivity
- Workload distribution across team members
- Collaboration patterns and communication
- Team capacity and utilization
- Performance trends over time
Use these metrics to support team members, identify training needs, and optimize team composition.
Prerequisites
Required role:
- Members: See their own metrics
- Admins: View team-wide analytics
- Organization Owners: Full access across all teams
Plan availability:
- Free: Basic team metrics (5 members max)
- Pro: Advanced analytics (unlimited members)
- Enterprise: Full suite with custom metrics
Accessing Team Analytics
View team performance data:
- Navigate to Analytics → Team
- Select time period (week, month, quarter, year)
- Choose view:
- Overview (high-level summary)
- Individual Performance
- Workload Distribution
- Collaboration Metrics
- Comparative Analysis
- Apply filters:
- Specific team members
- Projects
- Task types
- Date ranges
Create saved views for common analyses like "Weekly Team Review" or "Monthly Performance Check."
Key Team Metrics
Team Productivity
Overall output and efficiency metrics:
Tasks Completed per Week: Track total team output over time.
Example Team (5 members):
Week 1: 42 tasks
Week 2: 38 tasks
Week 3: 45 tasks
Week 4: 40 tasks
Average: 41 tasks/week
Team Velocity: Combined velocity showing team capacity.
Completion Rate: Percentage of tasks finished on time across the team.
Team Efficiency Score: Composite metric combining:
- Completion rate (40%)
- Average cycle time (30%)
- Estimation accuracy (20%)
- Collaboration quality (10%)
Score ranges:
- 85-100: Excellent
- 70-84: Good
- 50-69: Needs improvement
- Below 50: Requires attention
Individual Performance
Personal productivity metrics for each team member:
Available for each person:
- Tasks completed (this period)
- Average completion time
- Completion rate
- Overdue task count
- Estimation accuracy
- Collaboration score (based on comments, reviews)
- Response time to mentions/assignments
Comparison to team:
- Personal velocity vs. team average
- Relative completion time
- Task distribution (what percentage of team's work)
Individual metrics should support growth, not create competition. Focus on trends and improvement, not rankings.
Workload Distribution
How work is balanced across the team:
Task Distribution:
Member A: 24 tasks (29%)
Member B: 18 tasks (22%)
Member C: 16 tasks (19%)
Member D: 15 tasks (18%)
Member E: 10 tasks (12%)
Total: 83 tasks
Healthy distribution:
- Each member has 15-25% of total tasks
- Variation within 10% of average
- No single member overwhelmed (>30%)
- No member underutilized (below 10%)
Warning signs:
- One person handling >40% of tasks
- Large gaps between highest and lowest
- Consistent pattern of imbalance over multiple weeks
Workload Heatmap: Visual representation showing:
- Who is overloaded (red)
- Who has capacity (green)
- Balanced workload (yellow)
Collaboration Metrics
How effectively the team works together:
Team Communication:
- Comments per task
- Response time to questions
- Mention usage and responsiveness
- Review feedback quality
Knowledge Sharing:
- Documentation contributions
- Help provided to teammates
- Cross-project collaboration
- Skill transfer activities
Handoff Efficiency: How smoothly work moves between team members:
- Average handoff time
- Number of handoffs per task
- Rework after handoff (quality indicator)
Workload Balancing
Identifying Imbalance
Detect workload issues early:
Automatic alerts when:
- Member has >30% more tasks than average
- Member has less than 50% of average tasks
- Same person consistently overloaded (3+ weeks)
- Task assignments don't match availability
Manual checks:
- View Workload Distribution chart weekly
- Compare assigned vs. completed tasks per person
- Check overdue task concentration
- Review task complexity distribution (not all tasks are equal)
Rebalancing Strategies
Short-term fixes:
- Reassign upcoming tasks from overloaded members
- Defer low-priority work for overwhelmed members
- Pair underutilized members with complex tasks for learning
- Temporarily increase capacity (if possible)
Long-term solutions:
- Review task assignment process
- Cross-train team members for better flexibility
- Adjust team composition or size
- Implement capacity planning
- Use AI agents to automate repetitive tasks
Capacity Planning
Plan work based on actual capacity:
Calculate individual capacity:
Available hours per week: 40
Meetings/admin: -10 hours
Focus time: 30 hours
Estimated task hours: 25-28 hours (buffer for unknowns)
Team capacity calculation:
5 team members × 25 hours = 125 productive hours/week
Average task duration: 5 hours
Expected tasks per week: 25 tasks (with buffer)
Adjust for:
- Vacations and time off
- Holidays
- Training and development time
- On-call rotations
- Support duties
Performance Tracking
Individual Development
Track growth and improvement:
Skill Development:
- Task types handled over time
- Complexity of work increasing
- Estimation accuracy improving
- Completion time decreasing
Growth Indicators:
- Taking on new task types
- Mentoring others
- Improving collaboration scores
- Reducing rework and errors
Support Opportunities:
- Identify struggling team members early
- Provide targeted training
- Adjust task complexity to skill level
- Offer mentorship or pairing
Team Evolution
Monitor team improvement over time:
Trend Analysis: Compare current period to previous:
- Is team velocity increasing?
- Are completion rates improving?
- Is cycle time decreasing?
- Are estimates more accurate?
Milestone Tracking: Set and monitor team goals:
- Increase velocity by 10% this quarter
- Improve on-time completion to 85%
- Reduce average cycle time to 3 days
- Achieve 90% estimation accuracy
Retrospective Support: Use analytics in team retrospectives:
- What improved this sprint?
- Where did we struggle?
- What patterns do the metrics reveal?
- What should we try differently?
Advanced Analytics
Productivity Patterns
Identify when your team works best:
Time-based Analysis:
- Best days: Which day of week has highest completion rates?
- Peak hours: When are most tasks completed?
- Slump periods: When does productivity dip?
Use insights to:
- Schedule important work during peak times
- Avoid meetings during high-productivity hours
- Plan sprint work around productivity patterns
- Account for known slump periods
Skill Matrix
Visualize team capabilities:
Create a skill matrix:
Skill | Member A | Member B | Member C | Member D | Member E
--------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------
Frontend Dev | Expert | Advanced | Basic | Basic | None
Backend Dev | Advanced | Expert | Advanced | Basic | Basic
Design | Basic | None | Advanced | Expert | Basic
Testing | Advanced | Basic | Expert | Advanced | Advanced
DevOps | Basic | Advanced | Basic | Basic | Expert
Skill levels:
- Expert: Can mentor others
- Advanced: Independent work
- Basic: Can contribute with guidance
- None: Needs training
Use for:
- Task assignment optimization
- Identifying training needs
- Succession planning
- Hiring decisions
Comparative Analysis
Compare team performance across different dimensions:
Project Comparison: How does the team perform on different projects?
- Project A: 85% completion rate
- Project B: 92% completion rate
- Project C: 78% completion rate
Analysis: Project C may need clearer requirements or better planning.
Sprint Comparison: Track performance across sprints:
- Sprint velocity trends
- Completion rate changes
- Quality metrics evolution
- Team satisfaction scores
Team Comparison (for organizations with multiple teams):
- Benchmark against other teams
- Share best practices from high performers
- Identify common challenges
- Learn from diverse approaches
Team Analytics Use Cases
Use Case 1: Sprint Retrospective
Prepare for retrospective:
- Pull last sprint metrics:
- Velocity actual vs. planned
- Completion rate
- Average cycle time
- Workload distribution
- Identify discussion topics:
- Why did velocity drop 20%?
- Why did Member B have 40% of tasks?
- Why did cycle time increase?
- Lead data-driven conversation
- Set improvement goals for next sprint
Outcome: Fact-based retrospectives with clear action items
Use Case 2: Performance Reviews
Support 1-on-1 conversations:
- Review individual metrics (6-month view):
- Task completion trends
- Skill development (task types handled)
- Collaboration contributions
- Improvement areas
- Celebrate growth:
- "Your cycle time decreased by 30%"
- "You're now handling advanced tasks independently"
- "Your collaboration score increased significantly"
- Set personal goals:
- "Let's improve estimation accuracy"
- "Try mentoring junior team members"
- "Take on more complex projects"
Outcome: Objective performance discussions with clear evidence
Use Case 3: Capacity Planning
Plan next quarter:
- Review last quarter team capacity
- Account for upcoming absences (vacations, holidays)
- Calculate available capacity
- Plan projects based on realistic capacity
- Build in 20% buffer for unknowns
Example:
Last quarter velocity: 160 tasks
Upcoming time off: -15 days (3 team members)
Reduced capacity: -24 tasks
Expected velocity: 136 tasks
Add 20% buffer: Plan for 108-120 tasks
Outcome: Realistic commitments and predictable delivery
Use Case 4: Team Rebalancing
Address workload imbalance:
- Identify overloaded member (Sarah: 35 tasks, team avg: 22)
- Review task complexity (not just count)
- Reassign appropriate tasks to team members with capacity
- Provide Sarah with high-priority work only
- Monitor for improvement over 2 weeks
Outcome: Healthier workload distribution, reduced burnout risk
Troubleshooting
Metrics Show Low Productivity But Team Is Busy
Possible causes:
- Tasks not being marked complete
- Working on tasks not in Verk
- Meetings and interruptions not tracked
- Task complexity higher than usual
- Scope creep extending task duration
Investigation:
- Survey team about where time is spent
- Check for untracked work
- Review meeting schedules
- Analyze task complexity trends
Individual Metrics Seem Unfair
Common concerns:
- "Senior members get easier tasks"
- "I work on complex projects that take longer"
- "My tasks require more research/coordination"
Solutions:
- Add task complexity weighting (story points)
- Track different task types separately
- Focus on improvement trends, not absolute numbers
- Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative assessment
- Consider context in all evaluations
Team Metrics Declining
Diagnostic steps:
- Review workload changes (increased complexity?)
- Check for team changes (new members ramping up?)
- Identify external factors (shifting priorities, increased meetings)
- Survey team about obstacles
- Review process changes recently implemented
Recovery plan:
- Address identified root causes
- Remove unnecessary obstacles
- Provide additional support where needed
- Adjust expectations if complexity increased
- Celebrate small improvements
Analytics Creating Team Tension
Warning signs:
- Team members gaming metrics
- Unhealthy competition
- Resistance to tracking
- Focus on quantity over quality
Corrective actions:
- Emphasize metrics are for team improvement, not individual judgment
- Focus on team goals, not individual rankings
- Combine metrics with qualitative feedback
- Use metrics to identify support needs, not punishment
- Make metrics transparent and collaborative
Best Practices
Focus on Team Success Celebrate team achievements, not individual competition. Use metrics to lift everyone up.
Combine with Conversations Metrics reveal what is happening, conversations reveal why. Always pair data with discussion.
Look for Patterns Single-week anomalies don't matter. Focus on trends over 4+ weeks for meaningful insights.
Account for Context Not all tasks are equal. Consider complexity, uncertainty, and dependencies when interpreting metrics.
Use for Support, Not Surveillance Identify where team members need help, training, or resources. Don't use metrics to micromanage.
Make Metrics Transparent Team members should have access to their own metrics and understand how they're calculated.
Set Team Goals Together Collaborative goal-setting creates ownership. Let the team set their own improvement targets.
Celebrate Improvements Recognize when metrics improve. This reinforces positive changes and motivates continued growth.
Review Regularly Weekly quick checks and monthly deep dives keep metrics useful and current.
Act on Insights Metrics without action are wasted. Every insight should lead to a decision or experiment.
Related Documentation
- Dashboard Overview - Main analytics dashboard
- Task Analytics - Task-specific metrics
- Custom Reports - Build custom team reports
- Member Management - Manage team members
- Organization Settings - Team configuration
Questions about team analytics? Our support team can help you interpret metrics and build effective teams.